18:30:51 From Peter Haberl & Virginia Harel to Everyone: Our main question is - why nine stories? This makes the building loom over the neighbourhood. Please offer alternatives. 18:33:36 From Art Lytle to Everyone: We would like the developers to explain how they will deal with the extra load on the storm and sewage systems. There is already a major issue with flooding in the immediate area 18:37:37 From Anita VandenBygaart to Everyone: Has the property sale been finalized? 18:37:48 From 2 - Lisa Stern - City Planner to Everyone: lisa.stern@ottawa.ca 18:41:52 From Rick Nelson to Everyone: At the last meeting Ryan claimed they could build up to 27000 meters. I emailed him to ask how he got these numbers but never got any reply. The number he claimed was totally false because this site zoning has a FSI=2. Please explain why you were misleading our community 18:42:11 From Kevin Brewer CBLCA to Everyone: This development dose not align with the current OP (and Zoning) how does it fit within the proposed New OP? 18:43:07 From Elly to Everyone: Has a shading analysis been completed for the 9-story and 6-story build? If so, could you please share it? If not, when will they be completed? And will it be shared then? 18:43:17 From Rick Nelson to Everyone: Why cannot you live with FSI=2? 18:45:20 From Rick Nelson to Everyone: is it 4a and 4b or 4a or 4b 18:46:00 From Suzanne to Everyone: Theresa, you indicated at the last meeting that you were going to looking the future plan for the Carling widening. Any update to that? 18:47:27 From Peter Haberl & Virginia Harel to Everyone: 10-11 stories for those existing properties would be way out of line with the neighbourhood, even in the future. So this should not be a basis for justifying 9 stories. 18:47:30 From Kevin Williams to Everyone: Widening of Carling would be terrible. 18:47:48 From Rick Nelson to Everyone: Nico - why will you not explain what the FSI restricts you to? 18:47:59 From Kate Twiss to Everyone: Can you, please, tell me where in the official plan you find that Carling west of Bayshore Drive is designated an arterial road? I'm not disputing it. I have just not been able to find it and it seems to me to be more a collector in a residential neighbourhood. 18:50:55 From 677309 to Everyone: The land that you are referring to used to be part of the Champlain Sea. As a result of that, Leda clay is extensively throughout the area. What is the depth of Leda clay??. At what level? 18:53:54 From Councillor Theresa Kavanagh to Everyone: Please note questions will be answered after the presentation. Thanks! 18:55:57 From Rick Nelson to Everyone: Road allowances have been there for a while - if you did any research you would stop these claims 18:58:53 From Elly to Everyone: What is the height of the builds in the setback area? 18:59:28 From Kevin Brewer CBLCA to Everyone: Our community survey (360) responses showed very little support for a 9 storey towers (~13%), how will you, as our Councilor, be approaching this issue of re-zonning? 19:00:31 From Glenn to Everyone: What do u mean by amenity space. Is that a common space patio 19:01:06 From Art Lytle to Everyone: Do you really think that 12 visitor parking spots is enough for 2 9 storey residential buildings. Everyone will be parking in the neighbourhood behind. 19:02:19 From Rick Nelson to Everyone: I hope you realize that the closest BRT rapid transit station has been closed for the next 3 years. So much for rapid transit. 19:02:21 From Art Lytle to Everyone: I thought this meeting is for the neighbourhood behind not to sell all the great features of your rental units. We are not going to rent them. 19:03:14 From Tom Montor to Everyone: So some significant rezoning requests to maximize # of units: significant height increase (18.5m => 30m), depth (3m => 1.5m offset reduction), significant floor density increase, etc, etc. These are not trivial rezoning requests and will hugely transform the nature of Crystal Beach. To say nothing of the precedent it sets for the other properties currently on sale for high density development. 19:03:55 From Rick Nelson to Everyone: And OC Transpo said 2 weeks ago that the bus use in Crystal Beach is so low they will not entertain any increase in services 19:03:57 From Laura C. to Everyone: The first 4 floors fit in with the neighbour and it should stop there… 19:04:17 From David McKay to Everyone: The balconies on the South side will be extremely intrusive. 19:04:32 From Kate Twiss to Everyone: The building architecture could go in any location in any city. Have you thought of any nautical references, any recognition of the location near the sailing club and the river? Other developments on the street have made some effort. Just putting in windows and balconies doesn't make it specific to its location. 19:05:35 From Kate Twiss to Everyone: Google says there's a thirty-minute walk to Moodie station. 19:06:58 From Rick Nelson to Everyone: 27210 sq meters is totally wrong.as you ignored the FSI factor. You are NOT allowed to build what you claim you can. 19:08:08 From Rick Nelson to Everyone: No more Moodie station 19:09:27 From Steven to Everyone: Your perception of support for 9 storeys is not consistent with the survey results 19:10:00 From Kevin Brewer CBLCA to Everyone: sorry but there was no back forth in that first meeting, we simply listened to what you proposed. I don't remember that question being asked on our opinions of hieght 19:10:46 From Sheldon Rice to Everyone: At the June meeting your presentation was for 2 x six stories. How is that you are now presentation is for nine story buildings. 19:11:08 From Art Lytle to Everyone: The ones who are really affected by this very tall building are your neighbours to the south. Our backyards are no longer private - no matter how recessed your balconies are. 19:11:23 From Steven to Everyone: To truly demonstrate your desire to be a good neighbour, would you please remove the top 5 storeys of your proposal and re-submit your plan? 19:13:07 From Art Lytle to Everyone: Not to mention up to 230 cars driving 3m from my back yard daily into the parking garage. 19:13:32 From Tony De Marinis to Everyone: Very clear that developer can make much more money with 2x9 storey buildings than 1x6 storey. Could be the same design that is being proposed except less height. Once this project is approved, any remaining areas along Carling will ask for more height also A coffee shop at grade is much less important than the detrimental affects to residents to the south, changes to current community conditions, etc. Architect should be challenged to come up with a maximum 6 storey design that fits into the community. 19:14:07 From Peter Haberl & Virginia Harel to Everyone: I think more people are now aware of this than were involved in the first community meeting, and that is why 9 stories is (aptly) a concern. Quite aside from zoning, 9 stories simply does not fit with the rest of the community. The "precedent" of 34 meters/11stories for neighbouring areas is not applicable - no one in the neighbourhood would have been aware of this, since these are currently 3-3.5 stories and have been for years. Are you already considering lower height alternatives? 19:17:07 From 2 - Lisa Stern - City Planner to Everyone: https://devapps.ottawa.ca/en/applications/D02-02-21-0082/details 19:17:20 From Steven to Everyone: Impact at night: blocking of stars, light pollution from apartment units will impact to the south 19:17:48 From David McKay to Everyone: Yes, i agree. 19:20:23 From Peter Haberl & Virginia Harel to Everyone: Intensification by going to significant height should be closer to LRT, not in this part of neighbourhood. Here, it should be gradual, and consistent with 15-min. neighbourhood. 19:20:28 From Anita VandenBygaart to Everyone: double messaging.....wanting to intensify but ignoring objectives for future "15 min neighbourhoods" if you don't add some sort of commercial amenity 19:21:00 From Matthew Mantle-Parsons to Everyone: https://documents.ottawa.ca/sites/documents/files/documents/tmp_map_6_en.pdf 19:22:40 From Eric Letts to Everyone: is there a diagram that shows the shadow of the buildings? 19:28:36 From Rick Nelson to Everyone: Your planning rationale document mentions use of rapid transit. Do you realize that there is little to no rapid transit in this area? Are you going to update your planning rationale? 19:28:36 From Peter Haberl & Virginia Harel to Everyone: Was there any consideration of affordable housing for this proposal? 19:29:07 From Lukas Stodola to Everyone: Will the trees being proposed to be planted around the property be small or medium height? Also with the parts of the buildings that are white will it be solid white. If so it looks quite bold compared to the brick part. 19:29:10 From chris agius to Everyone: Would you consider purchasing my home at fair market value? This development will totally change the nature of the neighbourhood, destroy my personal privacy, not to mention the value of my home. 19:31:01 From Rick Nelson to Everyone: In the last meeting you gave the community a choice of a 6 story fat building or a more slender 9 story design when you knew the FSI=2 would not allow this. Why did you mislead the community? 19:33:36 From Steven to Everyone: Regarding the increase in density - currently no one lives at the site. A 4 storey building will increase the density. Why do you need to go 9 stories? 19:33:50 From Rick Nelson to Everyone: Can you explain why your development at Klondike and March Rd was substantially reduced in size from the initial proposal? 19:34:02 From Anita VandenBygaart to Everyone: Are you aware that the new OP is addressing intensification that is targeting inner urban areas, not this community? 19:37:20 From Margot's iPad to Everyone: How will you compensate the owners of neighbouring properties for the reduction in market value so that you can make a maximum profit? 19:37:58 From Suzanne to Everyone: Theresa - will you be responding to Kevin B’s question.? 19:38:02 From Peter Haberl & Virginia Harel to Everyone: We want to emphasize that we support intensification on this site, but it needs to be consistent with the neighbourhood - not such a giant step... 19:38:35 From Anita VandenBygaart to Everyone: agree 19:38:44 From Suzanne to Everyone: agree 19:38:52 From Eric Letts to Everyone: is it condo s or rentals? 19:39:17 From Peter Haberl & Virginia Harel to Everyone: Last remark - thanks to the presenters, councillor, staff and neighbours - this is a touchy topic but decorum was maintained...! 19:40:05 From Trudy Hall to Everyone: If the variances to the bylaws are granted, is the developer able to change major features or smaller features of the design? How committed is the developer committed to the design we are looking at now? 19:43:07 From Tom Montor to Everyone: Agree 19:43:49 From Kevin Brewer CBLCA to Everyone: Thank you Theresa, city staff and Developers, et al. 19:44:43 From chris agius to Everyone: Are you going to answer Margot's question? 19:45:35 From Rick Nelson to Everyone: Thanks. 19:46:30 From Suzanne to Everyone: please send email again please Lisa. 19:47:12 From Suzanne to Everyone: Found it 19:48:02 From 2 - Lisa Stern - City Planner to Everyone: lisa.stern@ottawa.ca 19:49:07 From Peter Haberl & Virginia Harel to Everyone: When is there likely to be a next public meeting on this? 19:49:32 From Elly to Everyone: Thank you 19:49:46 From Eric Letts to Everyone: thanks 19:49:46 From Peter Haberl & Virginia Harel to Everyone: OK, thanks, keep us informed.