19:04:37 From Doug Thomas to Everyone : At the appropriate juncture I would like to question the reasoning in regards to the parking equation and, what I think we will all agree will be a shortage leading to parking issues within the community. 19:06:36 From Connie - Assistant to Councillor Kavanagh to Everyone : Meeting is being recorded. 19:06:41 From Christine Hartley to Everyone : If we are all muted, how do we ask questions throughout the presentation? Also, we all had an opportunity to view the last meeting so I had hoped that this meeting would be more of a collaborative meeting. 19:07:44 From Marlita Perrault to Everyone : Ask questions by typing them into the chat. 19:07:52 From Theresa Kavanagh to Everyone : You can use chat to ask questions. We can also have you raise your hand if you do not feel your question is answered. Thanks 19:09:37 From Christine Hartley to Everyone : Please confirm: are all investors local (from Ottawa)? 19:09:57 From Deirdre Roeser to Everyone : Yes - D.Roeser 19:10:36 From Deirdre Roeser to Everyone : Sorry I, miss-read the question. 19:11:14 From Anna to Everyone : From the first meeting I understood that one of the partners lived in Toronto (has 'ties' in Ottawa) 19:16:58 From Connie - Assistant to Councillor Kavanagh to Everyone : Everyone can view at https://drive.google.com/file/d/11vk8XgmekgdE5Oe4gH2qYZmz2UAsLyBv/view 19:17:29 From Amanda Reed to Everyone : I'm guessing that there isn't an owner occupancy requirement/bylaw, so developer decision regarding rental vs ownership may not matter. Individual buyers will have the option to rent out their units. There is only a temporary rental bylaw that was just recently passed, I believe. Councillor, maybe you know? 19:18:37 From kathysee to Everyone : What are you planning to do to protect the viability (specifically the roots) of the existing trees on the property, as well as those on the property lines of the adjoining properties? 19:18:51 From Doug Thomas to Everyone : It's been my experience that a landlord/management firm has far less control over renters than owners. Noting of course that owners can always sublet. Are we attracting a desirable demographic? 19:19:47 From Connie - Assistant to Councillor Kavanagh to Everyone : https://www.baywardbulletin.ca/development-at-1940-carling-information-session/ 19:20:01 From Doug Thomas to Everyone : Wait what; the parking has not been nailed down? 19:20:01 From kathysee to Everyone : Are you, Domenic and Bill, willing to come meet the neighbours on their properties in order to fully understand from their perspective the impact a structure of this size will have? 19:22:56 From Andy to Everyone : Plantings in front of the building may not survive being so close to Carling 19:23:50 From Dave Ross to Everyone : Will the developer make sure that no trees will be trimmed or removed until a site visit is done by city forestry personnel. 19:24:33 From Amanda Reed to Everyone : Will this project need to meet city tree bylaws which were recently strengthened beginning 2021? 19:25:29 From Dr. Ken Reesor to Everyone : What is the require setback from Carling Ave? You mentioned landscaping at front -where? Looks like you ar butted up against Carling Ave. Since this is an important arterial main, does this meet bylaw? 19:26:33 From brian to Everyone : 1. Please confirm that as per the Official Plan Annex 1, Table 1, the Right of Way of Carling Ave. (between Richmond Rd. and Bronson Ave.) shall be protected to accommodate a 44.5m Right of Way and will be enforced. 2. Based on the above it is anticipated that approximately 7 to 7.25 m of right of way dedication (ROW currently appears to be 30 m(+/- ) adjacent to 1940 Carling Ave.) will be required by the City in conjunction with any development of this property. Please confirm 19:27:56 From Anna to Everyone : As Carling is an Arterial Main and Bill H says it is to accommodate light rail and designated bike lanes, won't Carling have to be significantly widened to accommodate these? If so, how will he developer adjust his plans? 19:28:21 From Amanda Reed to Everyone : There is already a lot of cross through traffic on Lenester. Have you looked in to the impact on neighbourhood traffic from this development and/or have you considered traffic mitigation measures, especially on Lenester? 19:28:42 From Christine Hartley to Everyone : I’m not sure that many of us in this area would want to move into a studio apartment when we need to/want to move out of our homes. 19:29:30 From Doug Thomas to Everyone : I would like to speak to the issue. 19:30:34 From Daryl Waggott to Everyone : Minimum seems like a low bar 19:31:26 From claudia to Everyone : I am also interested in the compatibiity studies that Bill H mentioned. Could you explain a bit more regarding a) what they would examine; b) when would they take place; and c) would their results be publicly available? 19:31:50 From valerie to Everyone : In this day of mail ordering/delivery I would urge and increase in the street level parking for deliveries and other ‘short term’ parking 19:33:19 From Doug Thomas to Everyone : Transit ridership is in a marked decline - the overflow will move onto the side streets and that will lead to by-law enforcement thereby changing the nature of the community. 19:33:24 From Susan Vered to Everyone : Have you considered the roof top be the community outdoor space and leaving the 4th floor roof as greenscape to retain neighbouring property's privacy? 19:33:39 From Christine Hartley to Everyone : Is there really only 1 elevator in the building? Would there not need to be more in a building with 72 units? 19:34:29 From brian to Everyone : AM 10 [2181] H(20) zoning: Identifies a minimum residential building setback 3.0 m from front property line. Please confirm that this will be maintained and not reduced. 19:34:43 From iryna to Everyone : We are concerned about the building being so close to Carling Avenue. First, the sidewalk is narrow, and very often you almost get hit by passing bus rearview mirror. Plus, with entrance / exit to the underground garage to a very busy Carling Ave will create jams for pedestrians and create dangerous situations. In addition, no passenger drop off area, no food delivery stopping zone, and no stopping zone for emergency vehicles will endanger people, pedestrians, cyclists, and create dangerous traffic situations. 19:36:02 From Team Rozel to Everyone : Would the developer request that the city provide access to the building for vehicles travelling west on Carling via a new turning lane added to the median? Concern is that there will be increased traffic on Hare Ave and then on Rozel Crescent as vehicles coming from the East will use this route to turn around and travel East to get to this building. As a resident of Rozel Crescent there is already substantial traffic due to vehicles using the crescent which are travelling west so that they can turn around and travel east down Carling. Would the city require a new turning lane so vehicles can travel in and out of this building without requiring excess travel through Glabar Park? 19:36:10 From Doug Thomas to Everyone : Good point - we can assume deliveries will be made by vehicles stopping directly on Carling. 19:38:53 From Daryl Waggott to Everyone : Mixed bus and bike lanes. 19:39:35 From Dr. Ken Reesor to Everyone : Regarding the increased traffic that will happen on Hare is there option for the city to close the median on Carling on Hare? 19:40:02 From Christine Hartley to Everyone : Not the best time to do a traffic assessment right now as COVID is keeping everyone at home.... 19:41:01 From iryna to Everyone : Also, a drive-in area for a school bus is necessary to ensure children safety. Also, there are lot of children walking to schools on Carling, and the narrow strip of the sidewalk left in front of the building will create dangerous situations, especially in the winter. 19:42:17 From Bill Meyer to Everyone : Is traffic study going to take into account ALL the future building that is going to happen…ie 26 story at Carling & Bromley ? 19:44:10 From Bill Meyer to Everyone : Rats have been an issue recently in the neighbourhood, what measures are going to be taken when digging up city sewers to control this ? 19:44:24 From Susan Vered to Everyone : With the increase trend towards online shopping and deliveries increasing density from one family unit to 71, and recognizing that other residential properties along Carling in the vicinity most have drive through entrance, or entry at a cross street. Can you address the concerns of a single underground garage to accommodate all these safety issues for pedestrians, youth and cyclists etc, ie, wouldn't a lay-by be preferred and safer? 19:44:44 From brian to Everyone : 8. Within 20 m of the rear lot line which is abutting residential zoning, the maximum building height is limited to 11m. Please confirm that the 11 m height restriction is inclusive of all roofing and will not be increased. 9. If an outdoor terrace is to be provided on the rear portion of this building please advise what would be the optimum and minimum setback from the building edge should be utilized to reduce “persons overviewing” the rear yards of adjacent residential properties. 10. It is understood that the maximum building height is 20 m to the finished roof elevation. Please confirm that this maximum 20 m height will be enforced. 19:47:00 From brian to Everyone : climbing 7 floors is a lot of stairs for anyone... 19:47:09 From Anna to Everyone : how affordable will these units be? Can you give an idea of what rents will be like? 19:47:10 From stevenaubry to Everyone : Does the .5 parking spots/unit formula reflect current population needs or is it an arbitrary target planners hope will be sufficient in the future? 19:47:15 From Dr. Ken Reesor to Everyone : Some people on community email have assumed this will create affordable housing - rent at 1940 Carling will be at least 40-50% higher than comparable space for example at Somerset Towers across the street-right? 19:51:33 From Daryl Waggott to Everyone : Would you consider a deceleration lane? It is very dangerous given the speeding on Carling. 20:00:39 From Anna to Everyone : Apparently there are vacancies at Somerset Towers and Bromley Towers ... and a plan for a 26 story building at Carling and Bromley. Do we really need more intensity re: rental units in this area? 20:01:09 From Anna to Everyone : * Bromley Square (correction to above) 20:02:20 From brian to Everyone : The drawing appears to indicate that front of the building to have a height of 22.850m (74.97’) above existing grade and the penthouse at 23.104m (75.8’) above existing grade. There must be an input error on the drawing. What are the actual heights as proposed? It aappears that the roof height of the proposed seventh floor is greater than zoning limit of 20m in height. Pls confirm that this will be revised to fit with zoning. 20:03:19 From Daryl Waggott to Everyone : How long will the proposed development take and what will be the impact for construction vehicles neighbouring streets? 20:05:25 From valerie to Everyone : As a resident in this neighbourhood I find it easier to support this development than I do the proposed 26storey at Carling/Bromley 20:10:47 From Brenda to Everyone : Not me Valerie. I truly believe the building is too big for the lot. 20:10:54 From Susan Vered to Everyone : Thank you for everyone's time and listening. 20:10:55 From Christine Hartley to Everyone : Thank you for coordinating this meeting, Councillor Kavanagh.